Michael Gove marked border-line fail

Education Secretary Michael Gove’s proposals for painful changes to our educational system appear to be meeting with a great thumbs down from parents, especially the overwhelming majority whose children go to state schools.

In a wide-ranging and fascinating survey undertaken by You-Gov which appears in February’s edition of Prospect magazine, it becomes very clear that parents do not want to see the end of the national curriculum or for GCSE and A levels based solely on exams. Neither do they want private companies to take over failing schools.

What parents do want is very revealing. To my utter joy traditional history teaching comes high on the list, especially that of our own country. Top of the demands is banning mobile phones in classrooms closely followed by the removal of teachers who underperform. Parents would also like to see a return to school uniform and the banning of unhealthy and junk food in schools.

It’s very clear from this comprehensive look at parents’ attitudes to education that most do not want root and branch change. They are looking for improvements in certain aspects of school life. To put it simply, parents want their children to behave better at school and for schools to take measures to bring this about.

In fact, most parents think state schools provide good quality education. In the survey 83 per cent were satisfied with their primary school, a figure which dropped to 77 per cent for secondary schools. This strong showing certainly gives the lie to Michael Gove’s claim that our education system is broken.

As for Mr Gove himself, 36 per cent though he was doing badly, 23 per cent well, while 41 per cent didn’t know. I’d put that somewhere on the border between pass and fail. Maybe a tough viva voce examination with unseen questions from parents of state school children would give him the extra marks he obviously so badly needs.

1 Comment

Filed under Labour Party

One response to “Michael Gove marked border-line fail

  1. I am sad that the issue was addressed overwhelmingly on a political and/or industrial relations basis.
    I think there was a real need to discuss whether England is not far too over-specialised at schools. I say this as a New Zealand who came to England in the middle of secondary schooling. Why is it so difficult to combine English, Mathematics and languages? As an example of university subjects that would benefit from such a combination at school level… Philosophy, Linguistics, Geography, Psychology and most social/economic sciences.
    If more economists did physics at school, it is my belief that neo-liberalism would be laughed out of court.
    Also I think that over-specialisation between humanities and sciences puts girls off maths and/or sciences if they must drop humanities subjects too soon. (humans vs geeks!!!)