Few issues have divided the European Parliament in the way that Silvio Berlusconi has managed to do. I am talking specifically about his iron grip on the Italian media, though there are, of course other issues – ultra right wing views, corruption and young women from escort agencies – to name but a few.
While not as gripping as the original debate, the sequel to my original post shows just how much media pluralism is a left-right issue. This is not really surprising when you consider that it is the right who concentrate media in their own hands, Rupert Murdoch being a good example to go along side Mr Berlusconi. I could also cite the Rothermere family, hardly a bastion of progressive thought. The Guardian/Observer are, unfortunately, hardly in the same league.
I did not, therefore, find it surprising that when we came to approve this week’s agenda for the plenary session of the European Parliament here in Strasbourg, the EPP raised objections to the resolution reported in my post.
They objected first of all to the title of the resolution which had already been changed to include “in the European Union” so that it didn’t refer exclusively to Italy. The EPP, of course, wanted to take out the reference to Italy all together, prior to their other amendment which was to postpone the whole debate. However, the EPP lost their chance to take Italy out, largely I think because the majority in the House realise just how poisonous Berlusconi actually is. Having lost this vote, the EPP then withdrew their call to postpone the vote on the resolution itself.