David Davis puts the Cat among the Pigeons

David Davis

It’s gratifying to be proved right, though rather less gratifying when it’s on such a fundamental subject as Britain in the EU.

Since I posted yesterday, David Cameron has been put in a very invidious position by the ex-Tory Shadow Home Secretary David Davis.  Davis has, in effect, issued a direct challenge to Cameron’s authority on Conservative policy towards Europe.

Writing here in the Daily Mail, Mr. Davis has called on the Tory leader to offer the public a referendum on the future of Britain’s relationship with the EU.  Davis’s challenge is, of course, a direct result of yesterday’s announcement that Cameron has abandoned his “cast iron” pledge that the Tories would hold a referendum on the Lisbon Treaty.

Cameron and the Tories have consistently and constantly argued that the Labour Government should have held a referendum on Lisbon.  What price honesty now, Mr. Cameron?

As we all know, the Conservatives made their U-turn after the Czech government caved in and signed up to the Treaty yesterday, removing the final obstacle to its ratification.  I would have thought Cameron and co might have anticipated this happening and made their policy accordingly.

For David Davis all seems startlingly clear.  He proclaims today:

“What we should do is, in my view, clear. We should have a referendum, not on the treaty, but on the negotiating mandate that the British Government takes to the European Union.

“The question should contain four or five specific strategic aims which clearly summarise our objectives.

“The sort of things we might include are: recovering control over our criminal justice, asylum and immigration policies; a robust opt-out of the European Charter of Fundamental Rights; serious exemptions to the seemingly endless flood of European regulations which cost the UK economy billions of pounds each year; a recovery of our rights to negotiate on trade; exemption from European interference into trade in services and foreign direct investment rules; and an exemption from any restrictions on our foreign policy.

“The referendum should be the first piece of legislation in the new parliament, and should be held within three months of the election.

“Some fear this would become an ‘in or out’ referendum, a decision on whether to continue our membership of the European Union. It would be nothing of the sort. Killing this tired old canard is one of the reasons the referendum question has to be absolutely clear in language and intent.

“Of course it is possible that we will not achieve every change we want.

If that is the outcome, we should give the British people the right to accept or reject it in a further referendum.”

So that’s all right then Mr. D.  Hold a referendum which will have no status whatsoever with the EU Council of Ministers, the European Commission or even the European Parliament and then seek to impose Tory Party prejudices on the EU as a whole.  Wow, that’s one hell of a policy.  I’m glad you believe it Mr. Davis because I can assure you no-one in the EU will give it even the smallest chink of the light of day, your referendum notwithstanding.

This David Davis nonsense only serves to highlight Tory wrong headedness on Europe.  The Davis faction, which to an outside observer seems to be the Tory grassroots, most Conservative MPs and the majority of the Shadow Cabinet, are quite honestly living in la la land.  It will simply not be possible to do what they want.  It is not a credible policy.

Since the Lisbon Treaty for the first time allows existing EU member states to withdraw from the European Union, the only referendum which makes any sense at all is the one on whether the UK remains in the EU or comes out.    

 David Davis in his article rejects such a referendum on EU membership, presumably because he thinks the he and the anti-Europeans would lose.

 The views of the Tory Party, as opposed to those of David Cameron, on Europe obviously remain confused to put it mildly.  It will be interesting to see whether my hunch that Cameron will go with his Party turns out to be correct.

David Cameron sits on the Horns of a Dilemma

EU CameronThe time has now arrived for David Cameron to come up with a new Conservative European policy.  Since Czech President Vaclav Klaus has ended all speculation and signed the Lisbon Treaty, the Tories no longer have even the slightest amount of wriggle room.  Cameron’s muddle through and hope for the best approach will no longer wash.  But what decisions will he take, or perhaps more to the point, what decisions will his Party allow him to take?

Many Tory MPs, most of the grassroots and right wing newspapers such as the Daily Telegraph want a hard line on Europe.  It never ceases to amaze me just how much time and energy the Tories are prepared to waste on the European Union.  I am utterly convinced that the Eurosceptics are fighting a lost cause; Britain has been in the EU for over 30 years and over half our exports go to EU countries.  We are in the EU and in Europe.  It would be madness to leave and expose Britain to an extremely uncertain and isolated future.  I believe the British people understand this and if push came to shove would make their views known.

However, Cameron no longer has the luxury of time on his side.  He needs to be credible from today right up to the General Election.  Will he follow his Party or go with the centre-right heads of government in the European Council?  The European leaders whom Cameron may once have viewed as his allies in Europe are almost to a man and woman fed up with the Tories leaving the EPP to set up their own Eurosceptic European Conservatives and Reformists Group.  There is little doubt that they will tell him that the EU works on the basis of compromise and that if the Tories seek to undo the Lisbon Treaty which has been the best part of 10 years in the making, and which grants Britain various opt-outs, British influence in Europe will suffer.

So heads (credibility with EU leaders) you lose with the grassroots and tails (popularity with Tory members) you lose with the heads of state.  If I were Mr Cameron (thankfully there’s no chance of that), this is a dilemma I would rather not have to face.  My strong hunch is that Cameron will go with his Party just as he did when he promised to take the Conservatives out of the centre-right European People’s Party (EPP) in the European Parliament in order to get himself elected Tory Leader.  The Conservatives have, after all, already decided that, should they form a government, they will introduce a law stating that future change to EU treaties will require ratification by referendum.

Going with Party rather than seeking influence in Europe’s corridors of power would be utter lunacy.  Surely any intelligent and right thinking person can see that Britain needs influence in the EU.  The EU is both our present and our future.  While I, for one, would never argue that the EU as presently constituted is perfect, influence gives Britain the opportunity to make improvements and stand up for our national interests.  Since the Tories have in the past claimed they do not wish to completely withdraw from the European Union, where is the logic in any future policy which may give away British influence?

Greens Support My Petition to Support the Met’s Trafficking Unit

jenny%20jones[1]I have had a nice letter of support from Jenny Jones and Darren Johnson the Green members of the Greater London Authority supporting my petition to keep the Metropolitan Police’s Trafficking Unit. Jenny writes on behalf of them both:

“I agree with you completely. It’s a stupid cost-saving measure which will harm trafficked people of all kinds.

As a member of the Metropolitan Police Authority (MPA) I have been fighting this closure and at the next MPA meeting I shall try to get a motion passed which will ask the Mayor to keep the unit open.”

Thanks to Darren and jenny for their support. I have had support across the Labour Party and from many other people. I am pleased to say that over 1,000 people have now signed the petition. If you have signed it thank you, can you ask a friend to sign please? If you have not signed  please click here to sign.

Robert and Dulcie Atkins

Tipstaff[1]Daniel Oxley, who posted a comment on my recent blog on the Lisbon Treaty, is an occasional commenter on the Honeyball Buzz.  He has recently suggested that there is something improper about Sir Robert Atkins Conservative MEP “publicising” his wife on his webiste. On his front page he has a link to his wife Lady Dulcie Atkins. Duclie Atkins (pictured in the middle) is also listed as working from their home the Manor House in Garstang on his contacts page. Now it seems to me that this may be a little clumsily presented, but I read it that Robert is trying to be open and clear that he employs his wife, and that she has a public life herself which she is of course entitled to. Indeed I note her involvement with the Conservative Womens Organisation which must make for interesting conversations bearing in mind Robert’s anti-women voting record.

I would also disagree with Robert on his opposition to extending education in Europe. I personally think it is not good practice as he does to pay for an office in his own home as he does. Like my Labour colleagues I often take work home, but I do not expect to be able to charge rent for doing so! I have raised before questions on his other expenses.

If Robert did not highlight his wife’s role, I am sure there would be others claiming he was trying to cover up her public duties. So I welcome his publicising these issues, although I think a little explanation would be helpful.

In these difficult economic times I wonder whether he would consider some economic regeneration? I am sure there must be some emtpy office premises in Garstang or nearby. How about taking some space and putting some money into the local economy?

Eleanor Tunnicliffe for Richmond Park

IMG_4226

The General Election campaign is starting. On Thursday evening I attended and spoke at Eleanor Tunnicliffe’s campaign launch to become MP for Richmond Park.  As you can see from the photographs I had a great time and the evening raised a good amount of money to go towards the General Election campaign.  Eleanor is an excellent candidate and I wish her and her local Labour Party every success.

IMG_4229IMG_4214IMG_4220IMG_4224

SSHH! Same Sex Hand Holding

2ad23819-7cea-4d9d-916e-a248de61cc73.299c4091-5c5b-47a6-b11b-8e5aa2037dfd.223.0[1]This evening there is a candlelit vigil in Trafalgar Square from 8pm against all hate crime. Do attend if you can, and if you cannot you can observe 2 minutes silence at 9pm. I have been deeply concerned at  a time when tolerance is rising,that there has been a rise in homophobic hate crimes. I am pleased that there is a visible way for lesbians and gay men to demonstrate in every community their love. Tomorrow is the second International Same Sex Hand Holding Day (SSHH!). I like this simple positive way of promoting equality which doesn’t require a letter, demonstration or lobby, just doing what comes naturally.

Feltham and Heston Labour Party

019The past few weeks have seen more European coverage in the British media than I have seen for a long time.  Given this,  I was pleased to be invited to talk to the General Committee of Feltham and Heston Labour Party yesterday.  I am always happy to go to GC meetings and other Labour Party events as it is all too easy as an MEP elected on a regional basis to become removed from Party members and activists.  This isn’t helped by being in Brussels and Strasbourg during the week.  So it was good to talk to a local Labour Party and I am pictured with Constituency Secretary Shantanu Rajawat .

As you may expect with Europe so much in the news, we had a good discussion.  Tony Blair’s candidacy for the position of President of the European Council was well up the agenda as was the strange and unfathomable decision by the Tories in the European Parliament to leave the moderate centre-right political group to set up their own group, the European Conservatives and Reformists.  As I have blogged before, the Tories’ partners in Europe are a rag-bag of unsavoury, ultra-right parties, including the homophobic Polish Law and Justice Party and their Latvian allies who celebrate the Waffen SS, not to mention the Belgian Lijst Dedecker who have strong links to the Vlams Belang, the Belgian equivalent of the BNP.  As if this were not enough, we know that both German Chancellor Angela Merkel and Nicolas Sarkozy, President of France, are deeply concerned that the British Conservatives, whom they view as their natural allies, have aligned themselves with political groups on the fringes of European politics.

The meeting also expressed its total hostility to the BNP in a lively discussion.  The general view was the although Nick Griffin had done himself more harm than good on “Question Time” we need to be vigilant against the BNP and work out policies to defeat them.  I explained that in the European Parliament Mr Griffin has excelled himself by making a spirited and completely erroneous denial of climate change.

Chris Bryant, our new Minister for Europe, has arrived at a most interesting.  Very best wishes to Chris in his new role, which, as a former Chair of the Labour Movement for Europe,  I know he will carry out well.  Labour MEPs look forward to seeing you in Brussels/Strasbourg very soon.

Good to see you Blogging Jess

llpstratford-221108-0156[1]I am delighted to see Jess Cordingly blogging today on Labour List. Jess used to work for me in Brussels, and left earlier this year to become the Managing Director of Future First.

“Future First is a grassroots initiative working to empower young people who are at or have recently studied at a state school. Future First works with schools to build networks of former students to advise, inform and inspire current students about their future prospects.”

Her post is all about giving better opportunities to state school pupils, something I have always campaigned for, I was a school governor for many years.

Jess was also great fun to work with as this picture at the London Labour Party Conference in Stratford last year captures. I hope to see more posts from her,we need to redress the male preponderence of the blogosphere.

Nicole Kidman Makes a Stand Against Violence Towards Women

Nicole Kidman

It’s always heartening when a non-political celebrity takes a stand on something outside their own particular work role.

Congratulations to Nicole Kidman, who is goodwill ambassador for the UN Development Fund for Women as well as being an Oscar winning actress, for telling the United States Congress that violence against women and girls is “perhaps the most systematic, widespread human rights violation in the world……[such violence] recognises no borders, no race or class”  

You can read the story here.

And Kidman practises what she preaches, turning down roles that objectify women.

Draft legislation against violence against women has been in front of Congress for over two years.  Let’s hope Kidman’s appearance has helped to speed it up.

Come On Boris, Support London’s Cross River Tram

cross_tram_logo[1]A real example of the prospects facing the country can be illustrated by the fate of the proposals for a Cross River Tram.  The plan is to link Camden Town through Waterloo to Brixton and Peckham. (Let me declare an interest, as a Camden resident it would be very helpful when it rains to be able to get to the Eurostar terminal at St. Pancras in the dry.  Only in the rain, I hasten to add, as I try and walk to St Pancras as much as posssible.) cross_river_tram[1]

The tram has plenty of other, more universal, benefits:

- Easing overcrowding on Londons public transport, especially stretches of the Northern, Piccadilly and Victoria lines which are among the most overcrowded in London.

- Helping to clean-up the capital by providing an environmentally friendly link to the centre of London as a real alternative to cars for trips into and around town.

- Acting as a commercially-attractive spur to greater investment as well as linking regeneration projects valued at more than £7 billion along its route including Kings Cross, Elephant and Castle, Peckham and Brixton.

- Halving  journey times into central London for some sections of the route, allowing people living in some of the most excluded communities in the UK easy access to the jobs and opportunities of central London.

I think the last point is the most important.  Theose communities who would benefit most from the Cross River Tram are amongst the poorest in London.  They, above all, deserve the chance the Tram could provide.

The Mayor of London has done much huffing and puffing about the western extension of the congestion charge.  I am very angry at Boris Johnson’s callous attitude.  The congestion charge helps our environment and our economy.   Instead of diverting effort and money into abolishing the congestion charge  in this area, the Mayor could have been productively applying his brainpower to the Cross River Tram. Instead progress on the tram has been frozen.  Regrettably, a project to help all Londoners and which could also help reduce carbon emissions is not a priority for London’s Conservatives.

You can read a full report on the Cross River Tram  proposal here, and a shorter summary here. If like me, you conclude that Transport for London should be giving this greater priority then please sign the petition asking Boris Johnson to back the Cross River Tram. You can so here:

http://www.gopetition.com/petitions/cross-river-tram.html