Honeyball’s Weekly Round-Up

Labour Party

This week saw Conservative MEPs vote against a Europe-wide initiative to provide aid for those struggling with food poverty. The £3 billion EU fund, known as ‘European aid to the most deprived’, would have sent £3 million in the direction of Britain. The choice to try and block the fund was made on the grounds that “It is not for the EU to dictate…how to help the needy. Individual countries must be allowed to decide for themselves.” It left the Tories among a tiny rump of MEPs voting against, making the Coalition the only European Government to oppose the fund.

With the Tories under pressure to address the explosion in the number of food bank users since they’ve been in office, their approach to Tuesday’s vote baffled many. It comes at a time when pressure is building on the Coalition to address the food poverty crisis, with religious and third sector organisations condemning the effect welfare cuts are having on UK rates of poverty. This week Richard Howitt, my Labour colleague in the European Parliament, called the Tories’ decision to vote against the fund “heartless and callous”.

Blocking European Aid is just the latest in a string of instances which have seen Conservatives adopting indefensible positions in the name of Euroscepticism. Before Christmas they blocked the Estrela report – a strategy to, among other things, end FGM – and they have also obstructed the EU Emissions Trading Scheme, a market-based solution to environmental challenges. They’ve done so on the grounds that endorsing such plans would represent a concession to the EU. This is despite the government’s Balance of Competences review so far finding that the weighting between EU powers and domestic autonomy is roughly right.

David Cameron’s increasingly hostile noises about the EU appear to have been taken by Tory MEPs as a license to indulge their most reactionary instincts. They do this irrespective of morality or the UK’s national interests. As a result we are approaching a state of Tea Party-style fanaticism among some on the British right in Brussels; a new and virulent brand of Euroscepticism. It’s vital that those of us who support the EU do not allow this self-defeating ideology to triumph.

Also this week, UKIP’s Spring Conference was overshadowed by the embarrassing revelation that Nigel Farage’s campaign slogan – “Love Britain: Vote UKIP” – was a rehash of a strapline used by the BNP. Nick Griffin’s far right party campaigned under the same banner in 2010, using the wording “Love Britain: Vote BNP”. The comparisons did not appear to end there, with Farage using his “Love Britain: Vote UKIP”-branded plinth to launch an excoriating attack on immigration, which he claims has made Britain “unrecognisable”. When the BNP link was pointed out Farage argued, bizarrely, that he’d been trying to ‘reclaim’ the slogan.

So far Ukip have resisted calls from the European far right to join ranks. Geert Wilders and Marine Le Pen have both attempted, unsuccessfully thus far, to reach out to Farage, pointing out the common ground their respective parties share with his. But with UKIP MEP Gerard Batten’s ties with the far right attracting increasing controversy – not to mention Farage’s recent admission that he supported the “basic principle” of Enoch Powell’s 1968 ‘Rivers of blood’ speech – the overlap between UKIP and the extreme right is becoming hard to disguise.

To avoid a return to the ugly politics and racial tensions of the 1970s Labour must contest UKIP’s narrative every step of the way.

One thought on “Honeyball’s Weekly Round-Up

  1. The picture is always presented of eurosceptics being right-wing ‘immature’ nutters.
    There are also left-wing objections, and in particular the WDM has consistently come out against the Translatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership(TTIP). In their link http://www.wdm.org.uk/trade/eu-us-trade-deal-%E2%80%98nothing-do-jobs%E2%80%99 , WDM director Nick Dearden states:
    “The idea that this trade deal will massively boost growth and jobs has been thoroughly discredited – even British officials can’t substantiate it. Research commissioned by the British government itself has concluded that the controversial investor-state dispute mechanism, which is at the heart of these talks, will be bad news for Britain.
    https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/costs-and-benefits-to-the-uk-of-an-eu-us-investment-protection-treaty

    “These talks are about embedding the power of big business into our society – guaranteeing corporations more privileges in public services, the environment, food safety and much more. It’s terrifying because this deal will set a new global standard which in time will affect almost all countries in the world.

    “If MPs care about their own power to set standards and rules regarding how corporations can behave, then they need to look carefully at this deal and not be taken in by the bogus figures out there which suggest this is all about jobs and growth. We believe the talks should be stopped in their tracks.”

    I invite Mary to add her voice to those mature voices on the LEFT who are not fooled by EU neo-liberalism.

    http://martinse.livejournal.com/tag/zz-trans-ocean-treaties

Comments are closed.