Comments on: Reform of the House of Lords is about modernising Britain not bashing Nick Clegg 2011/05/18/reform-of-the-house-of-lords-is-about-modernising-britain-not-bashing-nick-clegg/ London MEP European Parliament Tue, 01 Mar 2016 16:57:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ By: Daniel Oxley 2011/05/18/reform-of-the-house-of-lords-is-about-modernising-britain-not-bashing-nick-clegg/#comment-4505 Wed, 18 May 2011 21:23:56 +0000 ?p=14576#comment-4505 There is an inconsistency in this. Mary believes it to be abhorrent that a Prime Minister can appoint members of the House of Lords but she is not apparently troubled by the fact the same prime minister, together with other prime ministers and heads of governments in the EU should appoint the EU Commission which is a much more powerful entity.

It was wrong that Hermann von Rompuy was appointed to be our president on the say-so of prime ministers and heads of governments and if the EU were a democratic organisation, which it is not, there would have been a proper public election.

The public do mistakes of course. It is difficult to understand, for instance, what on earth the voters of Salford were thinking of when they voted again for Hazel Blears after she had abused their hard earned taxes but look at the alternative to letting the public decide.

Look especially, at the whole series of pitifully bad appointments to the EU Commission made by various British governments. Neil Kinnock went there after having led his party to defeat in a general election and Chris Patten got the job after he lost his seat in the House of Commons.

There are other examples of the doctrine that states that a person who makes a mess of everything in the UK, will by some magical process be brilliant in Brussels. There is Peter Mandelson who was kicked out of the UK government twice before becoming an EU Commissioner. The latest one is Baroness Ashton who pushed the much loathed Lisbon Treaty through the House of Lords and who worked hard to make Britain’s security worse at a time of threat before becoming the EU’s High Representative with special responsibilities for making blunders and being absent from important meetings.

Surely, the public would have chosen better than this.

]]>
By: Martin 2011/05/18/reform-of-the-house-of-lords-is-about-modernising-britain-not-bashing-nick-clegg/#comment-4502 Wed, 18 May 2011 13:27:55 +0000 ?p=14576#comment-4502 Personally I am not in favour of an elected HoL… we have one elected chamber and that is enough.
The only form of elected upper house I would favour is one of functional represenation, where for example, your trade union might be your constituency.
Otherwise we should not assume an appointed house is automatically patronage of the PM.
When will gypsies and travellers get representation? I think there should be a mechanism whereby under-represented groups get a look-in: until that can happen, don’t just have a duplicate elected house.

]]>