Comments on: Tories Still Believe in a Natural Social Order 2011/06/14/tories-still-believe-in-a-natural-social-order/ London MEP European Parliament Tue, 01 Mar 2016 16:56:57 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ By: Tory Realist 2011/06/14/tories-still-believe-in-a-natural-social-order/#comment-5033 Wed, 19 Oct 2011 18:30:11 +0000 ?p=14800#comment-5033 The idea that ‘innate intelligence’ exists and that it is possessed by the aristocracy, old money and the descendants of the rich is a nonsense. It is nothing more than an attempt by the Tories to protect positions of power and influence for their kind, and to entrench even greater social immobility in what is already the least socially mobile country in Europe thanks to Thatcherism.

The truth is that many Tories fear and resent the intelligence and abilities of people from humble backgrounds and those who didn’t go to public schools and they know that if Britain was a truly equal country in terms of opportunity and life chances they and their kind would be excluded from any power or influence.

David Cameron and George Osborne’s ascent to power provides ample evidence of the means that idiots with good connections have at their disposal.

]]>
By: Tory Realist 2011/06/14/tories-still-believe-in-a-natural-social-order/#comment-5031 Wed, 19 Oct 2011 12:18:49 +0000 ?p=14800#comment-5031 Well Daniel, it’s worth analysing what actually happened in that 13 years, and relate it to what happened in the previous 18, and indeed relating the events of that 18 years to the 34 years of the postwar consensus which immnediately preceded it, before trying to jump to any conclusions about Labour’s 13 years in power and the wealth gap.

For 34 years, the years of the postwar consensus, inequality fell steadily until by 1979 Brtitain was much more equal in terms of rich and pooir than had ever been the case prior to then. Then along came Thatcher, who destroyed millions of jobs, structures for training and opportunities, tax breaks for the rich and wage cuts for the poor and those on middle incomes. Needless to say the wealth gap shot up from 79 till 1997, and it was a direct result of Thatcher and the Tories’ policies. Labout got in in 1997, and their policies led to a disstinct slowdown in the rate of increasing inequality, as any graph will depict. It increased, albeit at a much slower rate than under the Tories, because parts of Labour’s policies were still Thatcherite and neoliberal; it did not increase because of Labour, but because of Thatcherism; Labour did not do enough to address the problems Thatcherism had created.

]]>
By: Martin 2011/06/14/tories-still-believe-in-a-natural-social-order/#comment-4649 Thu, 16 Jun 2011 09:47:21 +0000 ?p=14800#comment-4649 Many years ago psychologists Eysenck and Jensen set aptitude tests which suggested aptitude was 80% inherited, but they then argued as if achieved overall IQ (a weighted average of individual tests for aptitude) were also 80% inherited and only 20% environmental.

It is mathematically possible for aptitude to be 100% inherited and overall IQ to be 100% environmental.

]]>
By: Daniel Oxley 2011/06/14/tories-still-believe-in-a-natural-social-order/#comment-4643 Tue, 14 Jun 2011 20:16:21 +0000 ?p=14800#comment-4643 It was perhaps worth reflecting that for all Labour’s talk of fairness and equality, after their thriteen years in office the gap between the rich and the poor widened.

]]>