A Devastating Blow to Victims of Human Trafficking

I’m very saddened to discover that the plan to redirect the funding and responsibility for caring for victims of trafficking from the Poppy Project to the Salvation Army has become reality today.

As I detailed in a previous blog, over the past few years the Poppy Project has been doing a fantastic job rehabilitating trafficked women. Victims of trafficking were able to stay in the secure accommodation provided by the charity for usually between three and eight months during which time trafficked women were provided with secure accommodation, therapy, English language skills, legal advice and healthcare. They have also been running helplines and advisory services for victims of trafficking.

The redirecting of funds to the Salvation Army, who are planning to cut the amount of resources spent on each individual, means that the duration which women may spend in rehabilitation will be halved and vital aspects of their current services will be discarded.

I am also deeply uneasy that this extremely important and complex issue is being taken out of the hands of specialised providers and given to an organisation that does not have the same level of expertise or experience. There are also serious concerns that entrusting the care of trafficked women to an avowedly religious organisation could lead to conflicts of interests should these women be of a different religion, require abortion services, or be homosexual.

The Poppy Project argue that this decision is politically motivated as the Poppy Project has successfully appealed 17 UK Border Agency decisions on identification of trafficking victims and forced countless reassessments.

It is clear therefore that despite government promises to the contrary, this decision highlights that they fundamentally fail to understand or care about this issue. Abigail Stepnitz, the national co-ordinator for the Poppy Project Eaves charity, points to letters from officials, which concede that, while the rape experienced by victims is “unfortunate”, it does not qualify them for government help – a shining example of the so-called ‘compassion’ shown by this Tory-led coalition.

Women who have experienced trafficking need specialised rehabilitation given by people who understand what they have been through, not a generic “salvation service”. This is just another example of how this government fails to understand the needs of the most vulnerabe in our society, women in particular. The Poppy Project is determined to try and continue providing their essential service but this now relies on charitable donations. Could I urge all who recognise this for the important issue it is to visit their website and donate what you can.

About these ads

2 Comments

Filed under Labour Party

2 responses to “A Devastating Blow to Victims of Human Trafficking

  1. as always… cut costs cut service

    since the C of E is our established church, why not them?

  2. Mary,
    This is indeed appalling news. I will take nothing away from the ‘Sally Army’ as they are a well respected organisation but I am not sure how they even begin to compare to the exceptionally brilliant work that Denise Marshall’s charity does helping illegally trafficked women to get back on their feet after exiting from the sex industry. The government have really got this one wrong, like so many other things which have a link to equality, dignity and respect. The Poppy Project is a specialised service and one which has now been placed in a very vulnerable position by this government.
    The Salvation is simply not up to delivering the standard of service that was being provided previously by Poppy. We should be under no illusion what will happen as a result of this decision. Vulnerable groups [i.e.. women] have again been targetted by the UK Government. Shame on you Cameron and Clegg!

    The previous comment makes reference to the church and this is exactly one of the reasons why they should NOT be involved in this work, as there are to many preconceptions about morality etc that will potentially act as a conflict to the interest of the women they are trying to help.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s