<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: THE IGNOMINIOUS DEMISE OF CAROLINE FLINT</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thehoneyballbuzz.com/2009/06/06/flint/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thehoneyballbuzz.com/2009/06/06/flint/</link>
	<description>London MEP European Parliament</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 22:57:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reavis Daniel Moore</title>
		<link>http://thehoneyballbuzz.com/2009/06/06/flint/#comment-1583</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Reavis Daniel Moore]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2009 10:58:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thehoneyballbuzz.com/?p=2531#comment-1583</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You sound like you&#039;re living in the 1950&#039;s.

&quot;I believe women should play by the rules.&quot; Ha! If women had played by the rules, their would be no women in politics, or leadership positions of any kind. 

&quot;...we are not yet advanced enough for women in politics, and men to some extent, to be obviously sexual in public.&quot; Says who? Apparently &quot;we&quot; are advanced enough (though you apparently aren&#039;t), as it seems like this photo spread has not really hurt Caroline&#039;s career. And what is it exactly your suggesting with this line, that women politicians should pretend to be non-sexual in public? Isn&#039;t that wholly disingenuous, and condescending to project a false identity to the voters?

Let go of your silly little value judgments, and leave the girl alone.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You sound like you&#8217;re living in the 1950&#8242;s.</p>
<p>&#8220;I believe women should play by the rules.&#8221; Ha! If women had played by the rules, their would be no women in politics, or leadership positions of any kind. </p>
<p>&#8220;&#8230;we are not yet advanced enough for women in politics, and men to some extent, to be obviously sexual in public.&#8221; Says who? Apparently &#8220;we&#8221; are advanced enough (though you apparently aren&#8217;t), as it seems like this photo spread has not really hurt Caroline&#8217;s career. And what is it exactly your suggesting with this line, that women politicians should pretend to be non-sexual in public? Isn&#8217;t that wholly disingenuous, and condescending to project a false identity to the voters?</p>
<p>Let go of your silly little value judgments, and leave the girl alone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nosemonkey</title>
		<link>http://thehoneyballbuzz.com/2009/06/06/flint/#comment-1045</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nosemonkey]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2009 14:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thehoneyballbuzz.com/?p=2531#comment-1045</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[*applause*

Spot on.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>*applause*</p>
<p>Spot on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AdamH</title>
		<link>http://thehoneyballbuzz.com/2009/06/06/flint/#comment-1041</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[AdamH]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2009 15:56:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thehoneyballbuzz.com/?p=2531#comment-1041</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s ironic that she&#039;s mad about being treated as &quot;window-dressing&quot;... Brown wouldn&#039;t promote her to bump up the number of women in the Cabinet, so really she&#039;s mad about, er. NOT being treated as window-dressing (!)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s ironic that she&#8217;s mad about being treated as &#8220;window-dressing&#8221;&#8230; Brown wouldn&#8217;t promote her to bump up the number of women in the Cabinet, so really she&#8217;s mad about, er. NOT being treated as window-dressing (!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

